RAFI-USA

Agriculture Production Contracts and Corporate Concentration Watch

 

Bulletin #3     January 2002

 

****************************************************************

Chapter 12 Bankruptcy

Competition Title of the Farm Bill

Tyson Foods, Inc. –

Action on new  state Producer Protection Acts

*****************************************************************

Reinstate Chapter 12 Bankruptcy

As long as this nation has any family farmers left, we will need the protections and options afforded them by Chapter 12 Bankruptcy.  Yet Chapter 12 has "sunset" again and needs to be reinstated now.  Better yet, it should be made a permanent chapter of the Bankruptcy Code.

 

Many poultry farmers who were "cut off" because they could not afford to "upgrade" their poultry houses are faced with huge debts, no birds in their perfectly good poultry houses and not enough income to meet minimum living expenses.  They are facing bankruptcy this year with no bankruptcy chapter that really meets their needs. Farm Advocate Benny Bunting says, "Our hotline handles cases of these and many other farmers who are making their situation worse by waiting for Chapter 12 to be reinstated."

 

*********************************************

 

The Farm Bill  - It’s that time again !

Debate on Senate Farm Bill is anticipated to start up again the first full week of February. Farmers will be working not only to protect the positive measures that have been included, but looking for new opportunities to include their issues.

 

One of the significant differences between this Farm Bill and previous Farm Bills has been the fact that contracting and concentration issues are actually in the debate and the legislation.

 

In September, the US Senate Agriculture Committee took up the Farm Bill. The initial Farm Bill legislation introduced in the Senate Agriculture Committee by co-chair Senator Harkin included a Competition Title designed to protect market access and competition. Among the measures included were amendments to the Packers and Stockyards Act to increase USDA authority to enforce fair trade practices related to contracts, the establishment of minimum standards for fair contracts and obligations for good faith bargaining between processors or handlers and contract producers.

 

While the Competition Title did not pass out of the Senate Agriculture Committee, several individual pieces have been successful amendments on the Senate Floor. These included the Feingold-Grassley-Harkin amendment prohibiting binding arbitration clauses in agricultural contracts.  This amendment establishes that contract farmers always have the right, once a dispute arises, to choose to take the dispute to court or to arbitration.

 

Another important amendment that passed was the Wellstone-Grassley-Johnson Amendment banning packer ownership. This amendment will prohibit packers from owning livestock more than 14 days prior to slaughter. It is designed to decrease the ability of large packers to manipulate the price of cattle and hogs. It exempts the commercial poultry industry, farm cooperatives and small packers.

 

Two coalitions in particular are working in Washington to protect open markets and empower farmers. The Campaign for Contract Agriculture Reform (CCAR) is a national alliance of organizations working to provide a voice for farmers and ranchers involved in contract agriculture. CCAR supports good faith bargaining between farmer associations and commercial processors and increased enforcement of the Packers and Stockyards Act to protect contract farmers from unfair trade practices. For more information on CCAR see:    http://www.rafiusa.org/actionalert/contractag/intro.html

 

CCAR also participates in a larger coalition of organizations brought together with the help of the National Campaign for Sustainable Agriculture. In May 2001 this larger group of organizations delivered a letter to congress with 62 organizations signed on that called for a Competition Title in the Farm Bill. To date 72 organizations have signed on. To see the text of the letter, go to <http://www.sustainableagriculture.net/compsign.htm>http://www.sustainableagriculture.net/compsign.htm)

 

The struggle is about to continue.  Stay tuned.

 

****************

 

Tyson  Executives Indicted

* At Tyson Foods, Inc., the world's largest poultry company, two executives and four former managers have been indicted on 36 counts of conspiracy to smuggle illegal immigrants to work at company processing plants in order to increase profits. The indictment, unsealed in federal court in Tennessee on Dec. 19th, is the largest case alleging corporate smuggling of illegal alien workers in U.S. history, according to the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS).  Company officials deny the charges saying that they have fired the staff involved and have cooperated with the INS after  discovering the 2   1/2 year "sting" operation.

 

In the indictment, the INS says that Tyson Foods executives "cultivated a corporate culture  in which hiring of illegal alien workers was condoned to meet production goals and to cut costs to maximize profits ."

 

* A Tyson Foods shareholder is suing the Directors of Tyson Foods for mismanagement causing the company to be charged with smuggling illegal immigrants.  Crandon Capital Partners accuses Don Tyson, senior chairman; John Tyson, chairman and CEO; and all other board members of failing to stop illegal acts that may damage the company.

 

*Tyson Foods and subsidiary Cobb-Vantress are 2 out of 6 poultry companies being sued by the city of Tulsa, Oklahoma for polluting Lake Eucha- Tulsa's water supply.  While admitting that there are also other causes, Tulsa Mayor, Susan Savage says the  many scientific studies of the area show that the overwhelming cause of the pollution is the overloading of nutrients (esp. phosphorus) in the lake watershed which comes largely from chicken farms that put out the poultry manure for fertilizer. The lawsuit seeks monetary damages for costs to treat the taste and odor of the lake water and includes an injunction to prevent further pollution.

 

  [ The lawsuit does not target the contract growers in the watershed since the Oklahoma Attorney General expressed his opinion that the poultry companies could be liable for pollution produced by their contract growers.]

 

*Tyson Foods is being sued by property owners around the Missouri/Oklahoma border for discharging millions of gallons of wastewater from its processing plant near Noel, MO directly into the Elk River which flows into Grand Lake, Oklahoma.  The suit also charges that the poultry company is responsible for the waste from the company's contract farms that is suspected of leaching into the lake.  Ten national law firms, including that of Robert Kennedy, Jr., will be assisting the plaintiffs with the case.

 

*Tyson Foods and hog farmer sued.  Court says Growers are "Agents" of the Contractor, not independent contractors. The Mid-January 2002 issue of Progressive Farmer reported on a recent case in Alabama where a hog farmer contracting with Tyson Foods Inc. had been sued by neighbors over alleged odors and waste coming from the farm.

A district court found that the farmer was an "agent" of Tyson Foods and therefore both the farmer and the company (Tyson) were liable for damages to the plaintiff.

 

Tyson appealed the jury verdict, but the Alabama Supreme Court agreed with the lower court and found that the production contract controlled the farmer's actions to the extent that he could not be considered an "independent contractor."

            http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=al&vol=1990131&invol=2                                          or

            Tyson Foods Inc. v. Stevens, 783S. 2d 804 (Ala.2000)

 

Huge Bonus for John Tyson

In spite of all of these "troubles" and others we have chosen to leave out of this report due to lack of space, Tyson Foods awarded John Tyson, CEO, a $2.1 million bonus on top of his $650,000 annual salary!  Tyson Foods also reported a substantial increase in profits for the first quarter of the present fiscal year.  That's what it is all about. How long will it last?

 

**********************************

State Contract Producer Protection Acts

 

Kansas

A Special Committee on Agriculture recommends that a contract protection bill be drafted

The Legislative Coordinating Council assigned the Special Committee on Agriculture the task of studying agriculture marketing and concentration issues in 2001.  The Special Committee held four hearings across the state to focus on certain ag topics.

 

Attorney Clay Fulcher, Arkansas: Mary Clouse, RAFI-USA, North Carolina; and Kansas turkey growers were among those who related their experiences with production contracts at the first hearing.  At later hearings,  contract protections were supported by Kansas Farmers Union, Kansas Farm Bureau, Kansas Cattleman's Association, and the Kansas National Farmers Organization.

 

As a result of the hearings, the Special Committee recommended (among other things) that a contract protection bill be drafted.  House Bill 2659 is the result of the process.  Among the bill's provisions, it is stated that no provision of a production contract shall:         

* deny the producer the ability to address a dispute in the Kansas courts

* require the producer to accept sick, defective or substandard contract inputs  

* shall discourage or prohibit contract producers from associating with

                        other contract producers to address concerns or problems or to

                        collectively negotiate production contract terms.

 

Georgia

House Bill 308, Agricultural Production Contracts, is a bill to amend Title 2 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated to provide for the regulation of certain agricultural production contracts and for other purposes.  The bill was introduced in January of 2001 with six sponsors.  A hearing was held in Atlanta and others are planned.  The United Poultry Growers, headquartered in Montezuma, and the Georgia Poultry Justice Alliance with an office in Atlanta are coordinating the efforts to pass the bill this year.

 

HB 308 and the lists of sponsors can be found at http://www.legis.state.ga.us/Legis/2001_02/sum/hb308.htm

 

If you are travelling to Atlanta by car, you might see the billboard below.  It is located at the intersection of I-985 and Friendship Rd. on the way into Atlanta and near Gainesville.

 

To help win support for HR308, the Sierra Club donated the funds for the billboard for the next 3 months.  "Crooked Chicken" is a website maintained by poultry growers trying to use new ways to get their message out to the general public.

 

 

**************************************************************************************

Comments and/or your email address for a subscription to: clouses64@yahoo.com

To unsubscribe: send "reply" with  "unsubscribe" in the subject line.